Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

ASME RA S 1.3 2017

$98.04

ASME RA-S-1.3 Standard for Radiological Accident Offsite Consequence Analysis (Level 3 PRA) to Support Nuclear Installation Applications

Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
ASME 2017 88
Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Category:

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our online customer service team by clicking on the bottom right corner. We’re here to assist you 24/7.
Email:[email protected]

This Standard sets forth requirements for determining consequences as part of PRAs and related analysis methodologies that can be used to support risk-informed decisions for commercial nuclear power plants. This standard also prescribes a process for applying these requirements for certain other applications involving release of radioactive materials into the atmosphere [e.g., non-light water reactor (LWR) nuclear power plants, research reactors, fuel cycle facilities, and non-reactor nuclear Department of Energy (DOE) facilities]. In these cases, supplemental requirements may be needed to ensure technical adequacy.

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages PDF Title
5 FOREWORD
8 PREPARATION OF TECHNICAL INQUIRIES TO THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR RISK MANAGEMENT
10 COMMITTEE ROSTERS
14 Section 1 Introduction
1.1 Objective
1.2 Coordination With Other Probabilistic Risk Assessment Standards
1.3 Purpose and Scope
16 1.4 Structure for Level 3 Requirements
1.4.1 Level 3 Technical Elements
1.4.2 High Level Requirements
1.4.3 Supporting Requirements (SRs)
1.4.4 Capability Categories
17 1.5 The Nature of the Requirements
18 1.6 Risk Assessment Application Process: Section 3
1.7 Level 3 consequence analysis technical requirements: Section 4
1.8 Risk estimation (RI): Section 5
1.9 Configuration Control: Section 6
1.10 Peer Review: Section 7
1.11 Documentation Requirements
1.12 Use of expert judgment
19 1.12.1 Objective of Using Expert Judgment
1.12.2 Identification of the Technical Issue
1.12.3 Determination of the Need for Outside Expert Judgment
1.12.4 Identification of Expert Judgment Process
1.12.5 Identification and Selection of Evaluator Experts
20 1.12.6 Identification and Selection of Technical Issue Experts
1.13 Process Check
1.14 Computer codes: appendix a
22 Section 2 Acronyms and Definitions
2.1 Acronyms And Abreviations
24 2.2 Definition of terms
29 Section 3 Risk Assessment Application Process
3.1 Purpose
30 3.2 Identification of Application and Determination of Capability Categories (Stage A)
3.2.1 Identification of Application
3.2.2 Determination of Capability Categories
3.3 Assessment of PRA for Necessary Scope, Results, and Models (Stage B)
3.3.1 Necessary Scope and Risk Metrics
31 3.3.2 Peer Review
3.4 Determination of the Standard’s Scope and Level of Detail (Stage C)
3.5 Comparison of Level 3 Model to Standard (Stage D)
3.6 Accessing the Risk Implications (Stage E)
3.6.1 Use of Supplementary Analyses
3.6.2 Results of Supplementary Analyses
33 Section 4 Level 3 Consequence Analysis Technical Requirements
4.1 Scope
4.2 Level 3 consequence Model
4.3 Technical Requirements: General
34 4.4 Probabilistic Framework for Consequence Analyses
4.5 Radionuclide Release characterization for Level 3 (RE)
4.5.1 Introduction
4.5.2 Objectives
4.5.3 High Level Requirements
38 4.6 Protective Action Parameters and Other Site Data (PA)
4.6.1 Introduction
4.6.2 Objectives
4.6.3 High Level Requirements
44 4.7 Meteorological Data (ME)
4.7.1 Introduction
4.7.2 Objective
4.7.3 High Level Requirements
48 4.8 Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion (AD)
4.8.1 Introduction
49 4.8.2 Objective
50 4.8.3 High Level Requirements
54 4.9 Dosimetry (DO)
4.9.1 Introduction
4.9.1.1 Dosimetry Basis Model
55 4.9.1.2 Dose Conversion Factors
4.9.1.3 Consumption Pathways
4.9.1.4 Cloudshine and Groundshine
4.9.1.5 Skin Deposition
4.9.2 Objective
56 4.9.3 High Level Requirements for Dosimetry
58 4.10 Health Effects (HE)
4.10.1 Introduction
59 4.10.2 Objective
4.10.3 High Level Requirements for Health Effects
61 4.11 Economic Factors (EC)
4.11.1 Introduction
62 4.11.2 Objective
4.11.3 High Level Requirements for Economic Factors
65 4.12 CONDITIONAL CONSEQUENCE QUANTIFICATION AND REPORTING (QT)
4.12.1 Introduction
4.12.2 Objective
4.12.3 High Level Requirements
68 Section 5 Risk Estimation (RI)
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 Objective
5.3 High Level Requirements
71 Section 6 Configuration Control
6.1 Purpose
6.2 PRA Configuration Control Program
6.3 Monitoring Inputs and Collecting New Information
6.4 Maintenance and Upgrades
72 6.5 Pending Changes
6.6 Use of computer Codes
6.7 Documentation
73 Section 7 Peer Review
7.1 Purpose
7.2 Frequency
7.3 Methodology
74 7.4 Peer Reviewer Team composition and Personnel Qualifications
7.4.1 Collective Team
7.4.2 Individual Team Members General
7.4.3 Review Team Members for Upgrades
7.4.4 Knowledge of Specific Aspects of Level 3
75 7.4.5 Review of Level 3 Technical Elements to Confirm the Methodology
7.4.6 Expert Judgment
7.4.7 PRA Configuration Control
7.4.8 Documentation
7.4.8.1 Peer Review Team Documentation
7.4.8.2 Resolution of Peer Review Team Comments
76 Section 8 References
79 NONMANDATORY APPENDIX A COMPUTER CODES
A.1 COMPUTER CODES
ASME RA S 1.3 2017
$98.04