ACI 228.1R 03:2003 Edition
$38.19
228.1R-03: In-Place Methods to Estimate Concrete Strength
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
ACI | 2003 | 44 |
Guidance is provided on the use of methods to estimate the in-place strength of concrete in new and existing construction. The methods include: rebound number, penetration resistance, pullout, break-off, ultrasonic pulse velocity, maturity, and cast-in-place cylinders. The principle, inherent limitations, and repeatability of each method are reviewed. Procedures are presented for developing the relationship needed to estimate compressive strength from in-place results. Factors to consider in planning in-place tests are discussed, and statistical techniques to interpret test results are presented. The use of in-place tests for acceptance of concrete is introduced. The appendix provides information on the number of strength levels that should be used to develop the strength relationship and explains a regression analysis procedure that accounts for error in both dependent and independent variables. Keywords: coefficient of variation; compressive strength; construction; in-place tests; nondestructive tests; safety; sampling; statistical analysis.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
1 | CONTENTS |
2 | CHAPTER 1— INTRODUCTION 1.1— Scope 1.2—Need for in-place tests during construction |
3 | 1.3—Influence of ACI 318 1.4—Recommendations in other ACI documents 1.5—Existing construction |
4 | 1.6—Objective of report CHAPTER 2— REVIEW OF METHODS 2.1— Introduction 2.2—Rebound number (ASTM C 805) |
5 | 2.3—Penetration resistance (ASTM C 803/C 803M) |
6 | 2.4—Pullout test (ASTM C 900) |
9 | 2.5—Break-off number (ASTM C 1150) |
10 | 2.6—Ultrasonic pulse velocity (ASTM C 597) |
11 | 2.7—Maturity method (ASTM C 1074) |
13 | 2.8—Cast-in-place cylinders (ASTM C 873 2.9—Strength limitations 2.10—Combined methods |
14 | 2.11—Summary CHAPTER 3— STATISTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TEST RESULTS 3.1—Need for statistical analysis |
15 | 3.2—Repeatability of test results 3.2.1 Rebound number |
16 | 3.2.2 Penetration resistance |
17 | 3.2.3 Pullout test |
19 | 3.2.4 Break-off test |
20 | 3.2.5 Pulse velocity 3.2.6 Maturity method |
21 | 3.2.7 Cast-in-place cylinder CHAPTER 4— DEVELOPMENT OF STRENGTH RELATIONSHIP 4.1—General 4.2—New construction 4.2.1 General 4.2.2 Number of strength levels 4.2.3 Number of replications |
22 | 4.2.4 Regression analysis |
23 | 4.2.5 Procedures for correlation testing 4.2.5.1 Rebound number |
24 | 4.2.5.2 Penetration resistance 4.2.5.3 Pullout test 4.2.5.4 Break-off test 4.2.5.5 Ultrasonic pulse velocity |
25 | 4.2.5.6 Maturity method 4.2.5.7 Cast-in-place cylinder 4.3—Existing construction 4.3.1 General 4.3.2 Developing strength relationship |
26 | CHAPTER 5— IMPLEMENTATION OF IN- PLACE TESTING 5.1— New construction 5.1.1 Preconstruction consensus 5.1.2 Number of test locations 5.1.3 Number of tests per location 5.1.4 Providing access to test locations |
28 | 5.1.5 Distribution of tests |
29 | 5.1.6 Critical dimensions 5.2—Existing construction 5.2.1 Pretesting meeting 5.2.2 Sampling plan 5.2.3 Number of tests |
30 | CHAPTER 6— INTERPRETATION AND REPORTING OF RESULTS 6.1—General 6.2—Statistical methods 6.2.1 Danish method (Bickley 1982b) 6.2.2 General tolerance factor method (Hindo andBergstrom 1985) |
32 | 6.2.3 Rigorous method (Stone and Reeve 1986) 6.2.4 Alternative method (Carino 1993) |
34 | 6.2.5 Summary 6.3—Reporting results |
35 | CHAPTER 7— IN-PLACE TESTS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF CONCRETE 7.1— General 7.2—Acceptance criteria 7.2.1 Molded cylinders 7.2.2 Cores 7.2.3 In-place tests |
36 | 7.3—Early-age testing CHAPTER 8— REFERENCES 8.1— Referenced standards and reports |
37 | 8.2—Cited references |
40 | APPENDIX A.1— Minimum number of strength levels |
41 | A.2—Regression analysis with X-error (Mandel 1984) |
42 | A.3—Standard deviation of estimated Y-value (Stone and Reeve 1986) |
43 | A.4—Example |