Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

BSI PD IEC TR 61850-7-6:2019

$215.11

Communication networks and systems for power utility automation – Guideline for definition of Basic Application Profiles (BAPs) using IEC 61850

Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
BSI 2019 72
Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Category:

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our online customer service team by clicking on the bottom right corner. We’re here to assist you 24/7.
Email:[email protected]

This part of IEC 61850, which is a technical report, is focused on building application / function profiles and specifies a methodology to define Basic Application Profiles (BAPs). These Basic Application Profiles provide a framework for interoperable interaction within or between typical substation automation functions. BAPs are intended to define a subset of features of IEC 61850 in order to facilitate interoperability in a modular way in practical applications.

It is the intention of this document to provide a common and generic way to describe the functional behaviour of a specific application function in the domain of power utility automation systems as a common denominator of various possible interpretations/implementations of using IEC 61850.

The guidelines in this document are based on the functional definitions of

  • IEC 61850-5, Communication requirements for functions and device models, which gives a comprehensive overview of all application functions needed in a state-of-the-art substation automation implementation.

  • IEC TR 61850-7-500, Basic information and communication structure – Use of logical nodes for modelling application functions and related concepts and guidelines for substations, which illustrates and explains application functions for the substation/protection domain of Logical Nodes in modelling simple and complex functions, to improve common understanding in modelling and data exchange, and finally to lead to interoperable implementations.

  • IEC TR 61850-90-3, Using IEC 61850 for condition monitoring diagnosis and analysis, which gives use cases and data modelling for condition monitoring diagnosis and analysis functions for substation and power grid facilities.

This document does not describe the applications and respective implementation requirements; the focus is on their typical information exchange including data and communication services and engineering conventions.

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages PDF Title
2 undefined
4 CONTENTS
8 FOREWORD
10 INTRODUCTION
11 1 Scope
2 Normative references
12 3 Terms and definitions
13 4 Methodology for profiling
4.1 General
14 4.2 IEC 61850 profiling concept
4.2.1 General
Figures
Figure 1 – Stakeholders collaborate in user groups to create a common IOP profile
15 4.2.2 IEC 61850 profile definition
Figure 2 – Framework for profiling IEC 61850
16 4.3 Basic Application Profiles (BAPs)
18 4.4 Basic Application Interoperability Profiles (BAIOPs)
Figure 3 – Aggregating BAPs
20 4.5 Process from a use case to interoperability on SGAM function layer
Figure 4 – Framework for testing a profile
21 Figure 5 – Relation between BAP and SGAM interoperability
Figure 6 – Device features covered by profiles depending on compatibility levelsaccording to IEC Technical Committee 65, Industrial-process measurement, control and automation
22 4.6 Managing profiles
4.7 Implementation of BAPs in real projects
Figure 7 – BAPs and BAIOPs as building blocks for user/project specific implementation and testing
23 Annex A (informative)Example for BAP of distributed automation function“reverse blocking” using BAP template
A.1 Functional description
Figure A.1 – Behaviour in the event of faults on an outflow bay
24 Figure A.2 – Behaviour in the event of busbar faults
25 A.2 Description of use case and associated roles/actors
A.2.1 List of roles / actors
A.2.2 Use case
Figure A.3 – List of roles / actors reverse blocking
Figure A.4 – Use case reverse blocking
26 A.2.3 Sequence diagram of typical interactions
Figure A.5 – Sequence diagram reverse blocking
27 A.3 Logical architecture
A.4 Allocation variants (conditional)
A.5 Functional variants
A.5.1 Core functional variants
A.5.2 Noncore functional variants
Figure A.6 – Logical architecture reverse blocking
28 A.6 Performance requirements
A.6.1 Functional related
A.6.2 Service related
A.7 Description of data model per actor
A.7.1 General
29 A.7.2 PTOC for blocked function (infeed bay)
Tables
Table A.1 – Selection of data attributes for PTOC of actor blocked
30 A.7.3 PTOC for blocking function 1 to n (outflow bay(s))
A.7.4 Monitoring
Table A.2 – Selection of data attributes for PTOC of actor blocking
Table A.3 – Selection of data attributes of PTOC for monitoring
31 A.8 Communication services
A.9 Device related requirements (conditional) – Test behaviour
A.10 Engineering tool related requirements
A.11 Naming rules
A.12 Capabilities for testing
32 Annex B (informative)Example for BAP of “condition monitoring diagnosis functionsof on-load tap changer” using BAP template
B.1 Functional description
Figure B.1 – Structure of LTC
33 Figure B.2 – Overview of system configuration of LTC condition monitoring
Figure B.3 – Typical system configuration of LTC condition monitoring system
34 B.2 Description of use case and associated roles/actors
B.2.1 List of roles / actors
Table B.1 – List of actors
35 B.2.2 Use case
Figure B.4 – Use cases
36 B.2.3 Sequence diagram of typical interactions
Figure B.5 – Sequence diagram for monitoring operation property
37 Figure B.6 – Sequence diagram for monitoring operation counts
Figure B.7 – Sequence diagram for monitoring contact abrasion
38 Figure B.8 – Sequence diagram for monitoring oil temperature and flow
Figure B.9 – Sequence diagram for monitoring operation of oil filter unit
39 B.3 Logical Architecture
B.3.1 Overview
Figure B.10 – Logical architecture
40 B.3.2 Monitoring operation property
B.3.3 Monitoring operation counts
Figure B.11 – Logical architecture for monitoring operation property
Figure B.12 – Logical architecture for monitoring operation counts
41 B.3.4 Monitoring contact abrasion
B.3.5 Monitoring LTC oil temperature and flow
Figure B.13 – Logical architecture for monitoring contact abrasion
Figure B.14 – Logical architecture for monitoring LTC oil temperature and flow
42 B.3.6 Monitoring operation of oil filter unit
B.4 Allocation variants (conditional)
B.5 Functional variants
B.6 Performance requirements
B.6.1 Functional related
B.6.2 Service related
Figure B.15 – Logical architecture for monitoring operation of oil filter unit
43 B.7 Description of data model per actor
B.7.1 General
B.7.2 SLTC
Table B.2 – Selection of data attributes of SLTC
46 B.7.3 YLTC
B.7.4 TTRQ
B.7.5 TCTR
Table B.3 – Selection of data attributes of YLTC
Table B.4 – Selection of data attributes of TTRQ
Table B.5 – Selection of data attributes of TCTR
47 B.7.6 SIML
B.7.7 TTMP
Table B.6 – Selection of data attributes of SIML
Table B.7 – Selection of data attributes of TTMP
48 B.7.8 KFIL
B.8 Communication services
B.9 Device related requirements (conditional)
B.10 Engineering tool related requirements
B.11 Naming rules
B.12 Capabilities for testing
Table B.8 – Selection of data attributes of KFIL
49 Annex C (informative)Example for BAP of protection function “line distance protection”using BAP template
C.1 Functional description
C.2 Description of use case and associated roles/actors
C.2.1 List of roles / actors
50 C.2.2 Use case
Figure C.1 – Use case distance protection
51 C.2.3 Sequence diagram of typical interactions
Figure C.2 – Sequence diagram distance protection
52 C.3 Logical architecture
C.4 Allocation variants (conditional)
C.5 Functional variants
C.5.1 Core functional variants
Figure C.3 – Logical architecture distance protection
53 C.5.2 Noncore functional variants (different features for testing)
C.6 Performance requirements)
C.6.1 Functional related
C.6.2 Service related
54 C.7 Description of data model per actor
Table C.1 – Description of data model
56 C.8 Communication services
C.8.1 General
C.8.2 Variant FA:
Table C.2 – Services for variant FA
57 C.8.3 Variant FB:
C.9 Device related requirements (conditional)
C.9.1 Degraded operation behaviour
Table C.3 – Services for variant FB
58 C.10 Engineering tool related requirements
C.11 Naming rules
C.12 Capabilites for testing
Table C.4 – Degraded operation behaviours
59 Annex D (informative)Example of BAIOP for BAP reverse blocking(without process bus)
D.1 General
D.2 Test description
D.2.1 General
60 D.2.2 Normal sequence of reverse blocking
Figure D.1 – Normal sequence of application function reverse blocking
Table D.1 – Description of normal operation of application function reverse blocking
62 D.2.3 Functional description of test environment
D.2.4 Test reverse blocking – role blocking (without output to process)
Figure D.2 – Functional test environment
Figure D.3 – Test of role “blocking”
63 Table D.2 – Description of sequence for test of role “blocking”
64 D.2.5 Test reverse blocking – role blocked
Figure D.4 – Test of role “blocked”
65 Table D.3 – Description of sequence for test of role “blocked”
67 Annex E (informative)Example of BAIOP for BAP of “condition monitoring diagnosis functions of on-load tap changer”
E.1 General
E.2 Test description
E.2.1 Overview
68 E.2.2 Sequence of monitoring the motor drive current value
Figure E.1 – Sequence of monitoring the motor drive current value
69 Table E.1 – Description of the sequence of monitoring the motor drive current value
70 Bibliography
BSI PD IEC TR 61850-7-6:2019
$215.11