BSI PD IEC TR 63401-2:2022
$198.66
Dynamic characteristics of inverter-based resources in bulk power systems – Sub- and super-synchronous control interactions
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2022 | 68 |
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
4 | CONTENTS |
8 | FOREWORD |
10 | INTRODUCTION |
12 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions Figures Figure 1 – Multi-frequency oscillations in the modern power systemwith high-share of renewables and power electronic converters |
13 | 4 Terms, definitions and classification 4.1 Existing terms, definitions and historical background 4.1.1 General Figure 2 – Timeline of the historical developments of SSO terms,definitions and classification [12] |
14 | 4.1.2 Subsynchronous resonance (SSR) Figure 3 – Terms and classification of SSR by IEEE [13] |
15 | 4.1.3 Device dependent SSO (DDSSO) 4.2 Necessity to revisit the terms and classification 4.3 Revisiting the terms and classification 4.3.1 General |
16 | 4.3.2 Torsional interaction Figure 4 – Classification of subsynchronous interaction based on the origin [12] Figure 5 – Reclassification of subsynchronous interactionsbased on the interaction mechanism |
17 | 4.3.3 Network resonance 4.3.4 Control interaction |
18 | 4.4 Clause summary 5 SSCI incidents in real-world wind power systems 5.1 General Figure 6 – Timeline of SSCI events reported around the world |
19 | 5.2 SSCI in DFIGs connected to series-compensated networks 5.2.1 ERCOT SSCI incident in 2009 Figure 7 – Structure of the ERCOT wind power system in 2009 [16] |
20 | 5.2.2 ERCOT SSCI events in 2017 Figure 8 – Oscilloscope record of the 2009 SSCI event in the ERCOT system [19] Figure 9 – Structure of the ERCOT wind power system in 2017 [24] |
21 | Figure 10 – Event#1 August 24, 2017: current, voltage and frequency spectrumof the current during the SSCI event and after bypassing the series capacitor [24] |
22 | 5.2.3 SSCI events in Guyuan wind power system Figure 11 – Event#2 September 27, 2017: current, voltage and frequencyspectrum of the current during the SSCI event [24] Figure 12 – Event#3 October 27, 2017: current, voltage and frequency spectrumof the current during the SSCI event [24] |
23 | Figure 13 – Geographical layout of the Guyuan wind power system, Hebei Province, China |
24 | Figure 14 – Power flow measured at the 200 kV side of the Guyuan step-up transformer Figure 15 – Field recorded line current and frequency spectrum |
25 | Figure 16 – Field recorded voltage and frequency spectrum |
26 | 5.3 SSCI in FSC-based generators connected to weak AC network 5.3.1 SSCI event in Hami wind power system Figure 17 – Hami wind power system, Xinjiang, China [27] |
27 | Figure 18 – Current (upper plot) and active power (lower plot) Figure 19 – Frequency spectrum of the current (upper plot) and active power (lower plot) |
28 | Figure 20 – Field measured active power of a wind farm (a) From 09:46 to 09:47(b) From 11:52 to 11:53 Figure 21 – Torsional modes and frequency variation of the unstable oscillation |
29 | 5.4 Clause summary Figure 22 – Torsional speed of modes 1 to 3 of unit #2 in Plant M Tables Table 1 – Comparison of the characteristics of real-world SSCI events |
30 | 6 Modeling and analysis approaches 6.1 Preview 6.2 Time-domain modeling and analysis approaches 6.2.1 General 6.2.2 Nonlinear time-domain EMT simulation 6.2.3 Controller hardware-in-the-loop simulation |
31 | 6.2.4 Linearized state-space modeling and modal analysis Figure 23 – Configuration of CHIL simulation |
32 | 6.2.5 Discussions on time-domain approaches for SSCI studies 6.3 Frequency-domain modeling and analysis approaches 6.3.1 Frequency scanning Table 2 – Main Features of time-domain approaches for SSCI studies |
33 | 6.3.2 Complex torque coefficient method |
35 | 6.3.3 Impedance-based modeling and analysis |
36 | Figure 24 – Three-phase subsystem represented in the dq domainusing equivalent small-signal impedance Figure 25 – Three-phase subsystem represented in the sequencedomain using equivalent small-signal impedance |
38 | Figure 26 – Impedance measurement in a simple system |
40 | Figure 27 – A simple system in the impedance model, consistingof two separable components: source and load Figure 28 – Impedance model with voltage and current as input andoutput of the source and load sides; system stability is determinedby the two transfer function matrices, Zs(s) and Zl(s) Figure 29 – The unified dq-frame INM of a typical power system |
41 | 6.4 Guidelines on the approaches to SSCI studies |
42 | 6.5 Clause summary 7 Proposed benchmark models 7.1 Overview 7.2 Benchmark model based on Guyuan wind power system 7.2.1 General Figure 30 – Recommended guidelines for the SSCI stability analysisof a real-world wind power system |
43 | 7.2.2 Configuration and parameters of the WTGs and Guyuan substation 7.2.3 Parameters of the DFIG’s converter control 7.2.4 Series-compensated electrical network 7.2.5 Case study Figure 31 – One-line diagram of the proposed benchmark model adoptedfrom the Guyuan wind power system |
44 | 7.3 Benchmark model based on Hami wind power system 7.3.1 General Figure 32 – Simulation results of benchmark model (a) phase A current (b) frequency spectrum of the current (c) subsynchronous current component Figure 33 – One-line diagram of the proposed benchmarkmodel adopted from the Hami wind power system |
45 | 7.3.2 Configuration and parameters of FSCs 7.3.3 Configuration and parameters of LCC-HVDC Figure 34 – The structure of the LCC HVDC system |
46 | Figure 35 – AC filters and reactive power compensations Figure 36 – Three tuned DC filtersTT12/24/45 |
47 | 7.3.4 Synchronous generators 7.3.5 Electrical network 7.3.6 Case studies Figure 37 – The common electrical network |
48 | 7.4 Clause summary 8 Mitigation methods 8.1 General Figure 38 – SSO in the second benchmark model (a) the SG rotor speed(b) subsynchronous frequency component in the speed(c) time-frequency analysis of the rotor speed |
49 | 8.2 Bypassing the series capacitor 8.3 Selective tripping of WTGs |
50 | 8.4 Network/Grid-side subsynchronous damping controller (GSDC) Figure 39 – A system-wide SSCI mitigation scheme based on selective tripping of WTGs |
51 | Figure 40 – (a) A series-compensated wind power system with GSDC(b) design and configuration of GSDC including SSDC and SCG |
52 | 8.5 Generation-side subsynchronous mitigation schemes 8.5.1 Adjusting the wind turbine converter control parameters Figure 41 – CHIL test results of GSDC (a) active power (b) subsynchronous current |
53 | 8.5.2 Adding an SSDC in the RSC control loop Figure 42 – SSCI mitigation by increasing the Kp of the inner controllers of the GSC(a) voltage at PCC (b) current phase-A (c) active and reactive power Figure 43 – SSCI mitigation by reducing the PLL bandwidth (a) voltage at PCC(b) current phase-A (c) active and reactive power |
54 | Figure 44 – Control diagram of the virtual resistor for DFIG’s RSC controllers Figure 45 – The SSCI damped out when the virtual resistor is enabled at 2 seconds in simulation (a) voltage at PCC (b) current phase-A (c) active and reactive power |
55 | 8.5.3 Adding an SSDC in the GSC control loop Figure 46 – Control diagram of GSC of a typical FSC wind turbine Figure 47 – The SSCI mitigated after the virtual resistor is switched-on (a) voltage at PCC (b) current phase-A (c) active and reactive power |
56 | 8.6 Protection schemes 8.7 Clause summary 9 Future work |
58 | Annex A (Informative) Table A.1 – Number of DFIGs in the wind farms of Guyuan system Table A.2 – DFIG and step-up transformer parameters (Base capacity = 1,5 MW) Table A.3 – GSC control parameters |
59 | Table A.4 – RSC control parameters Table A.5 – Transmission lines and their parameters in Guyuan wind power system Table A.6 – Electrical parameters of the VSC Table A.7 – Specific parameters of the converter transformer |
60 | Table A.8 – Parameters of AC filters on the rectifier side (800 MW) Table A.9 – Parameters of AC filters on the inverter side (800 MW) Table A.10 – The control parameters of the LCC-HVDC system |
61 | Table A.11 – The rated parameters and electrical parametersof the synchronous generator Table A.12 – 660 MW steam turbine shafting equivalent lumped parameters Table A.13 – The common electrical network parameters (500 kV transmission line) |
62 | Bibliography |