BSI PD ISO/IEC TR 29181-2:2014
$189.07
Information technology. Future Network. Problem statement and requirements – Naming and addressing
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2014 | 46 |
This part of ISO/IEC TR 29181 describes the general characteristics of Future Network naming and addressing schemes, including problem statements, requirements, design objectives, gap analysis, and development directions.
-
Problem Statements: The characteristics and problems of existing NAS in existing network will be discussed.
-
Technical Challenges: A list of major technical challenges to assure that the FN-NAS will be able to provide solid technical support from the base level to meet the objectives of FN.
-
Requirements: The general characteristics of Future Network are discussed and their impact on NAS design.
-
Gap analysis: Examines the gap between existing network NAS and future network performance expectations.
In Annex A, FN-NAS Standardization Plan, design objectives, gap analysis, development guidance, chronological scenarios for future network naming, and addressing guidance are described in detail.
Though this part of ISO/IEC TR 29181 mainly presents a list of up-to-date surveyed problems, requirements, and plausible techniques for Future Network, it does not mean that all of those would be applied to a single Future Network in common, since the naming and addressing scheme can be applied to the various networks, such as global networks, local networks, access networks, mobile networks, etc. If a specific Future Network is designed and implemented, some appropriate parts of ISO/IEC TR 29181 would be considered depending on its network usage and its characteristics.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
7 | Foreword |
8 | Introduction |
9 | 1 Scope 2 Terms and Definitions |
11 | 3 Abbreviations |
12 | 4 Problem statements 4.1 Naming and Addressing in Network Operation 4.2 NAS Types 4.2.1 Telecom Network Naming and Addressing Schemes — addressing mode |
13 | 4.2.2 Telecom Network Naming and Addressing Schemes — naming mode 4.2.3 Computer Network Naming and Addressing Schemes — dual mode |
14 | 4.2.4 .Computer Network Naming and Addressing Schemes — naming mode 4.2.5 Hybrid Network Naming and Addressing Schemes — Addressing mode |
15 | 4.3 Problems in Network Integration 4.4 NAS and Network Performance |
16 | 4.5 Technical Limitations of Existing Naming and Addressing System 4.5.1 Central Registration Authority 4.5.2 Address Space exhaustion 4.5.3 Name and Address Costs 4.5.4 Identifier-Locator Separation 4.5.5 Routing Table 4.5.6 Vertical Addressing Structure 4.5.7 DNS Translation 4.5.8 Data Encryption 4.5.9 Address Category |
17 | 4.5.10 Policy 4.5.11 No Address in Native Language 4.5.12 No Decimal Naming System 4.5.13 IPv6 Limitations 4.6 FN-NAS Development Challenges 4.6.1 Scalability 4.6.2 Security 4.6.3 Mobility: 4.6.4 Quality of Service |
18 | 4.6.5 Heterogeneity 4.6.6 Robustness: 4.6.7 Customizability 4.6.8 Economic incentives 5 Requirements 5.1 Content Description |
19 | 5.2 System Technical Requirements 5.2.1 System Integrity Requirement 5.2.2 Intersystem Coherence Requirement 5.2.3 Structural Requirement |
20 | 5.2.4 Specific Technical Requirements |
24 | 5.2.5 Complementary Technical Requirements 5.2.6 Extension Technical Requirement |
25 | 5.2.7 Evaluation and Test Requirement 5.2.8 Infrastructure Requirement |
26 | Annex A (informative) FN-NAS Standardization Plan |
29 | Annex B (informative) Current Internet technology |
32 | Annex C (informative) Current Internet Views |
35 | Annex D (informative) Packet Transferring using Geographical addressing scheme |
41 | Bibliography |