FEMA P 2139 1 2020
$21.45
FEMA P-2139-1: Short-Period Building Collapse Performance and Recommendations for Improving Seismic Design Volume 1 – Overarching Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
FEMA | 2020 |
None
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
1 | FEMA P-2139-1 |
3 | Short-Period Building Collapse Performance and Recommendations for Improving Seismic Design Volume 1 – Overarching Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations |
5 | Foreword |
7 | Preface |
9 | Table of Contents |
11 | List of Figures |
15 | List of Tables |
17 | Chapter 1: Introduction |
18 | 1.1 Background and Purpose |
21 | 1.2 Approach and Scope |
23 | 1.3 Organization and Content |
25 | Chapter 2: Short-Period Building Background 2.1 Selection of Short-Period Building Systems for Detailed Studies |
31 | 2.2 Short-Period Building Seismic Performance Paradox |
32 | 2.3 Prior Analytical Studies of Bilinear SDOF Models |
39 | Chapter 3: Observed Collapse Performance and Benchmarks 3.1 Overview |
40 | 3.2 U.S. Earthquakes (1964–2014) and Building-Related Fatalities and Economic Losses |
42 | 3.3 Collapse Performance of Short-Period Buildings in Past Earthquakes |
44 | 3.3.1 Wood Light-Frame Buildings |
47 | 3.3.2 Reinforced Masonry Buildings |
49 | 3.3.3 Steel SCBF Buildings |
53 | 3.4 Benchmark Collapse Metrics of Short-Period Buildings Based on Wood Light-Frame Building Performance |
58 | 3.5 Summary of Key Observations of Short-Period Building Performance |
59 | Chapter 4: Archetypes, Parametric Studies, and Findings 4.1 Overview of Parametric Studies of Short-Period Buildings |
63 | 4.2 Summary of Archetype Designs and Configurations 4.2.1 Design of Wood Light-Frame Archetypes |
65 | 4.2.2 Design of Reinforced Masonry Archetypes |
66 | 4.2.3 Design of Steel SCBF Archetypes |
67 | 4.3 Summary of Numerical Modeling 4.3.1 Numerical Modeling of Wood Light-Frame Archetypes |
69 | 4.3.2 Numerical Modeling of Reinforced Masonry Archetypes |
72 | 4.3.3 Numerical Modeling of Steel SCBF Archetypes |
74 | 4.4 Summary of Numerical Results: High-Seismic Baseline Archetypes |
80 | 4.5 Key Findings Applicable to All Three Short-Period Systems 4.5.1 Key Findings of Baseline High-Seismic Studies |
81 | 4.5.2 Key Findings of Collapse Displacement Capacity Studies |
82 | 4.5.3 Key Findings of Baseline Very High-Seismic Studies |
83 | 4.5.4 Relationship between Strength and Collapse Displacement Capacity 4.5.5 Key Findings of SSI and Foundation Flexibility Studies |
85 | Chapter 5: Generic Collapse Performance 5.1 SDOF Study Purpose and Methods 5.1.1 Introduction |
86 | 5.1.2 SDOF Models |
88 | 5.1.3 Incremental Dynamic Analysis |
89 | 5.1.4 Collapse Evaluation Criteria |
92 | 5.2 SDOF Study Results 5.2.1 Peak Inelastic Displacement |
93 | 5.2.2 Collapse Fragility Curves |
97 | 5.2.3 Median Collapse Trends |
99 | 5.2.4 ACMR and ACMR/ACMR10% |
101 | 5.3 Comparison of ACMR Results with those of Prior SDOF Studies |
102 | 5.4 Notional Collapse Surfaces |
103 | 5.4.1 Approach 5.4.2 Collapse Surface Metrics |
106 | 5.4.3 SDOF Model Analysis and Collapse Results |
110 | 5.4.4 Development of Notional Collapse Surfaces |
119 | Chapter 6: Paradox Solved 6.1 Resolution of the Short-Period Building Seismic Performance Paradox 6.1.1 Collapse Trends with Period Reversed |
121 | 6.1.2 MCER Collapse Performance |
123 | 6.2 Applicability to Other SFRSs of Short-Period Buildings 6.2.1 Conceptual Relationship |
125 | 6.2.2 SFRSs of ASCE/SEI 7-16 |
127 | 6.3 Extrapolation to Other SFRSs of Short-Period Buildings |
131 | Chapter 7: Recommendations 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Recommendations for Improved Seismic Design Codes and Standards |
137 | 7.3 Recommendations for Advanced Seismic Design and Analysis |
138 | 7.4 Recommendations for Enhanced Modeling, Testing, and Data Collection |
141 | References |
149 | Project Participants Charles A. Kircher (Project Technical Director) |
154 | Back Cover |