IEEE 1527 2018
$52.54
IEEE Recommended Practice for the Design of Buswork Located in Seismically Active Areas
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
IEEE | 2018 | 91 |
Revision Standard – Active. Recommended practices for the engineering and design of flexible and rigid bus connections for bus and equipment in electric power substations located in seismically active areas are provided in this document.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
1 | IEEE Std 1527™-2018 Front cover |
2 | Title page |
4 | Important Notices and Disclaimers Concerning IEEE Standards Documents |
7 | Participants |
9 | Introduction |
10 | Contents |
12 | List of Figures |
14 | List of Tables |
15 | IMPORTANT NOTICE 1. Overview 1.1 Scope 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Application |
16 | 2. Normative references 3. Definitions, acronyms, and abbreviations 3.1 Definitions |
18 | 3.2 Acronyms and abbreviations 4. General design process 4.1 Introduction |
19 | 4.2 Main design criteria |
20 | 4.3 Design process for seismic connections |
21 | 5. Equipment movement and elongation demand 5.1 Introduction |
22 | 5.2 Seismic input 5.3 Foundation considerations 5.4 Basic connection geometry |
23 | 5.5 Determination of the elongation demand |
29 | 6. Design of flexible conductor 6.1 Advantages and limitations of flexible connection |
30 | 6.2 Available shapes, required conductor length, and qualitative behavior |
34 | 6.3 Verification of clearances, flexibility, and stability using the nonlinear finite element method |
40 | 6.4 Verification of clearances, stability, and flexibility experimentally |
42 | 6.5 Spacers for bundled conductors |
43 | 6.6 Standardized configuration design |
45 | 7. Design of rigid bus with flexible connector 7.1 General description |
47 | 7.2 Advantages and limitations of RB-FCs |
48 | 7.3 Design principles of an RB-FC 7.4 Available methods to evaluate the interaction effect |
49 | 7.5 Determination of RB-FC in-line load displacement properties |
51 | 7.6 Evaluation of interaction between equipment connected by rigid bus using a simplified analysis method |
57 | 8. Methodology to account for the interaction effects of conductors in the seismic qualification of substation equipment 8.1 Introduction 8.2 Inclusion of interaction effects in the seismic qualification of equipment |
59 | 9. Other considerations |
60 | Annex A (informative) Bibliography |
63 | Annex B (informative) Electrical clearances |
65 | Annex C (informative) Generalized single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) method |
68 | Annex D (informative) Comparison between combination methods to obtain the elongation demand |
70 | Annex E (informative) Effect of adding slack on the catenary configuration |
73 | Annex F (informative) Examples of finite element calculations |
75 | Annex G (informative) Common conductor input properties for finite element calculations |
76 | Annex H (informative) Examples of flexibility calculations for flexible conductors |
78 | Annex I (informative) Maximum horizontal forces measured during experiments |
79 | Annex J (informative) Other considerations J.1 Corona losses |
80 | J.2 Current-carrying capacity |
82 | J.3 High-current connections |
86 | J.4 Type of material to use—copper versus aluminum |
88 | J.5 Fault conditions J.6 Connection hardware |
89 | J.7 Bird caging of flexible conductors |
90 | J.8 Prevention of clearance violation with flexible bus using rigid bus extensions |
91 | Back cover |