{"id":198283,"date":"2024-10-19T12:37:22","date_gmt":"2024-10-19T12:37:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/aami-tir38-2019\/"},"modified":"2024-10-25T05:10:29","modified_gmt":"2024-10-25T05:10:29","slug":"aami-tir38-2019","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/aami\/aami-tir38-2019\/","title":{"rendered":"AAMI TIR38 2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
Provides guidance on how to complete an Assurance Case Report in order to comply with the new additional FDA pre-market requirements for infusion pumps. Includes a detailed but strictly hypothetical example from the medical device domain.<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1<\/td>\n | AAMI TIR38:2019; Medical device safety assurance case guidance <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
3<\/td>\n | Title page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
4<\/td>\n | AAMI Technical Information Report Copyright information <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
5<\/td>\n | Contents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
7<\/td>\n | Committee representation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
8<\/td>\n | Foreword <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
9<\/td>\n | Introduction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
11<\/td>\n | 1 Purpose 2 Scope 3 Relationship to other standards and FDA guidance <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
12<\/td>\n | 4 Terms and definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
13<\/td>\n | 5 Regulatory context <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
14<\/td>\n | 6 Safety case example for a generic medical device 6.1 Example objective 6.2 Safety case introduction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | Figure 1 \u2013 General safety case elements 6.3 Proposed model \u2014 Safety case elements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
16<\/td>\n | 6.3.1 Top-level goal Figure 2 \u2014 Safety case example \u2014 Focus on top-level goal 6.3.2 Contextual Information 6.3.3 Top-level strategy \/ argument elements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
18<\/td>\n | Figure 3 \u2014 Safety case example <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
19<\/td>\n | Figure 4 \u2013 Expanded safety case example 6.3.4 Proceeding strategy and goal elements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
20<\/td>\n | Table 1 \u2013 System hazard enumeration 6.3.5 Evidence elements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
21<\/td>\n | 6.3.6 Context, constraint, justifications, assumptions, and definition case elements 6.4 Proposed model \u2013 Example drug delivery safety case 6.4.1 Top-level goal elements \u2014 Example case <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
22<\/td>\n | Figure 4 \u2013 Example \u2014 Top-level goal for syringe safety case 6.4.2 Top-level argument or strategy elements \u2014 Example case Figure 5 \u2013 Example \u2014 Syringe safety case \u2013 Top-level argument structure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
23<\/td>\n | Table 2 \u2014 Example system hazard definitions 6.4.3 Iterative development of strategy and goal elements \u2014 Example case Table 3 \u2014 Enumeration of syringe delivery error hazards <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
24<\/td>\n | Figure 6 \u2014 Insufficient markings\/graduations \u2013 Initiating argument structure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
25<\/td>\n | Figure 7 \u2014 Absence of Markings \/ Graduations argument structure \u2013 Following from \u201cInsufficient Markings\/Graduations\u201d within Figure 6 Figure 8 \u2014 Causes of markings\/graduations degradation \u2013 Following from Absence of Markings \/ Graduations Argument Structure from Figure 7 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
26<\/td>\n | 6.4.4 Evidence elements \u2014 Example case Figure 9.1 \u2014 Marking\/graduation degradation due to thermal exposure Figure 9.2 \u2014 Pre-use causes and controls of marking\/graduation degradation due to thermal exposure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
27<\/td>\n | Figure 9.3 \u2014 Clinical-use causes and controls of marking\/graduation degradation due to thermal exposure Figure 9.4 \u2014 Material selection causes and controls of marking\/graduation degradation due to thermal exposure 7 Generation of system and sub-system hazards <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
28<\/td>\n | 8 Confidence arguments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | Table 4 \u2013 Information for confidence argument <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
30<\/td>\n | Figure 10 \u2013 Example \u2013 Combining safety and confidence arguments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
31<\/td>\n | 9 Challenge 10 Common mistakes to avoid Table 5 \u2014 Superficial argument example <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
32<\/td>\n | Table 6 \u2014 Undefined relationship example 11 Developing a safety case 11.1 Developing arguments 11.1.1 Strategies \/ arguments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
33<\/td>\n | 11.1.2 Argumentation and 4-Part Harmony 11.1.3 Assumptions \/ context \/ constraint \/ justification 11.2 Developing evidence 11.2.1 Evidence 11.2.2 Suitability of evidence <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
34<\/td>\n | 11.2.2.1 Relevance 11.2.2.2 Trustworthiness 11.2.2.3 Independence 11.3 General Assurance Case Development Process 11.3.1 Identify a claim 11.3.2 Define information needed to clarify the claim 11.3.3 Identify strategy to support the claim <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
35<\/td>\n | 11.3.4 Identify context, justification and assumptions needed to understand strategy 11.3.5 Elaborate strategy (identify new claims \u2013 back to step 1), or proceed to 11.3.6 11.3.6 Identify basic solution 12 Safety cases and risk management 12.1 Similarities between assurance case development and risk management 12.2 ANSI\/AAMI\/ISO 14971 and safety cases <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
36<\/td>\n | 13 Lifecycle management 14 Maintaining the safety case 15 Styles of safety case notation 15.1 Graphical notations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
37<\/td>\n | Figure 11 \u2014 Elements of GSN 15.2 Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
39<\/td>\n | Annex A (informative) Assurance cases and evidence of substantial equivalence <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
40<\/td>\n | Annex B (informative) Safety case model examples B.1 General B.2 Example #1: Syringe design safety case <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
42<\/td>\n | B.3 Example #2: Air in line safety case B.3.1 General Information about the example B.3.2 Embolus sub-claim: Air emboli hazard is adequately addressed <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
44<\/td>\n | Annex C (informative) Tool selection considerations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
45<\/td>\n | Annex D (informative) Developing a safety case for an existing product <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
47<\/td>\n | Annex E (informative) Lessons learned regarding safety cases E.1 Lessons learned from other industries E.2 Lessons from academia E.3 Experiences from medical device safety cases <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
48<\/td>\n | Table E.1 \u2014 Superficial argument example Table E.2 \u2014 Undefined relationship example <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
49<\/td>\n | Annex F (informative) Special consideration for software assurance <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" AAMI TIR38:2019 – Medical device safety assurance case guidance<\/b><\/p>\n |