This Technical Specification defines the interface, in terms of information flow, between industrial facilities and the \u201csmart grid\u201d. It identifies, profiles and extends where required, the standards needed to allow the exchange of the information needed to support the planning, management and control of electric energy flow between the industrial facility and the smart grid.<\/p>\n
Industry is a major consumer of electric power and in many cases this consumption can be scheduled to assist in minimizing overall peak demands on the smart grid. In addition, many industrial facilities have in-house generation or storage resources which can also assist in smart grid load management. While some larger industrial facilities already manage their use and supply of electric power, more widespread deployment, especially by smaller facilities, will depend upon the availability of readily available standard automated interfaces.<\/p>\n
Standards are already being developed for home and building automation interfaces to the smart grid; however the requirements of industry differ significantly and are addressed in this Technical Specification. For industry, the operation of energy resources within the facility will remain the responsibility of the facility operator. Incorrect operation of a resource could impact the safety of personnel, the facility, the environment or lead to production failure and equipment damage. In addition, larger facilities may have in-house production planning capabilities which might be co-ordinated with smart grid planning, to allow longer term energy planning.<\/p>\n
Specifically excluded from the scope of this Technical Specification are the protocols needed for the direct control of energy resources within a facility where the control and ultimate liability for such direct control is delegated by the industrial facility to an external entity (e.g. distributed energy resource (DER) control by the electrical grid operator).<\/p>\n
| PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4<\/td>\n | CONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 7<\/td>\n | FOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 9<\/td>\n | INTRODUCTION <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 10<\/td>\n | 1 Scope 2 Normative references <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 11<\/td>\n | 3 Terms and definitions 3.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 12<\/td>\n | 3.2 Models in automation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 13<\/td>\n | 3.3 Models in energy management system and smart grid <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 15<\/td>\n | 4 Abbreviations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 16<\/td>\n | 5 Requirements 5.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 17<\/td>\n | 5.2 Architecture requirements 5.2.1 General Figures Figure 1 \u2013 Overview of interface between FEMS and smart grid <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 18<\/td>\n | Figure 2 \u2013 Example facility electric power distribution <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 19<\/td>\n | 5.2.2 Energy management in industrial facilities Figure 3 \u2013 Facility enterprise and control systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 20<\/td>\n | Figure 4 \u2013 Model elements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 21<\/td>\n | Figure 5 \u2013 Model architecture: (a) main architecture, (b) task structure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 22<\/td>\n | 5.3 System interface model between facility and smart grid <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 23<\/td>\n | 5.4 Security requirements Figure 6 \u2013 Network architecture model <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 24<\/td>\n | 5.5 Safety requirements 5.6 Communication requirements 5.6.1 General 5.6.2 Use of common communications technology 5.6.3 Communication security requirements 5.6.4 Network availability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 25<\/td>\n | 5.6.5 Time synchronization 5.7 Audit logging requirements 5.8 Information requirements 5.8.1 General 5.8.2 Information attributes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 26<\/td>\n | Tables Table 1 \u2013 Required information <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 32<\/td>\n | Annex A (informative) User stories and use cases A.1 General A.2 User stories <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 33<\/td>\n | Table A.1 \u2013 Facility user stories: facility manager view points Table A.2 \u2013 Utility user stories: utility operator view points <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 34<\/td>\n | A.3 Use cases A.3.1 Use case analysis Table A.3 \u2013 Dependency between user stories and use cases <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 35<\/td>\n | A.3.2 Actor names and roles Figure\u00a0A.1 \u2013 Generic communication diagram between the smart grid and the FEMS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 36<\/td>\n | A.3.3 Use case descriptions Table A.4 \u2013 Actors and roles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 38<\/td>\n | Figure A.2 \u2013 Sequence diagram for FG-100 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 39<\/td>\n | Table A.5 \u2013 Exchanged information in FG-100 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 40<\/td>\n | Figure A.3 \u2013 Sequence diagram for FG-200 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 41<\/td>\n | Table A.6 \u2013 Exchanged information in FG-200 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 42<\/td>\n | Figure A.4 \u2013 Sequence diagram for FG-300 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 43<\/td>\n | Table A.7 \u2013 Exchanged information in FG-300 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 44<\/td>\n | Figure A.5 \u2013 Sequence diagram for FG-400 Table A.8 \u2013 Exchanged information in FG-400 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 45<\/td>\n | Figure A.6 \u2013 Sequence diagram for FG-500 Table A.9 \u2013 Exchanged information in FG-500 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 46<\/td>\n | Figure A.7 \u2013 Sequence diagram for FG-600 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 47<\/td>\n | Table A.10 \u2013 Exchanged information in FG-600 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 48<\/td>\n | Figure A.8 \u2013 Sequence diagram for FG-700 Table A.11 \u2013 Exchanged information in FG-700 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 49<\/td>\n | Annex B (informative) An application example of demand response energy management model B.1 General B.2 Main architecture Figure B.1 \u2013 An application example of demand response energy management model <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 50<\/td>\n | B.3 Structure of a task B.4 Approaches of energy management B.4.1 General Figure B.2 \u2013 Structure of water cooling task <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 51<\/td>\n | B.4.2 Approach 1 B.4.3 Approach 2 B.5 Mapping industrial demand response energy management model to use cases <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 53<\/td>\n | Annex C (normative) Security services <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 54<\/td>\n | Annex D (informative) Solutions for information requirement D.1 General D.2 Existing standards Table D.1 \u2013 Overview of existing standard applicability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 55<\/td>\n | D.3 Analysis for each use case D.3.1 General D.3.2 Analysis of “OpenADR2.0b” Table D.2 \u2013 “ADR2.0b” applicability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 56<\/td>\n | Figure D.1 \u2013 Interaction to register report Figure D.2 \u2013 Interaction to request report <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 57<\/td>\n | Figure D.3 \u2013 Simple setup exchange <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 58<\/td>\n | D.3.3 Analysis of “OASIS Energy Interoperation 1.0” Table D.3 \u2013 “OASIS Energy Interoperation 1.0” applicability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 59<\/td>\n | D.3.4 Analysis of “NAESB Energy Services Provider Interface (ESPI)” <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 60<\/td>\n | Table D.4 \u2013 “NAESB Energy Services Provider Interface (ESPI)” applicability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 61<\/td>\n | D.3.5 Analysis of “ISO\/WD 17800 Facility Smart Grid Information Model\u201d (FSGIM) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 62<\/td>\n | Table D.5 \u2013 “ISO\/WD 17800 Facility Smart Grid Information Model” applicability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 63<\/td>\n | D.3.6 Analysis of “SEP 2.0 (IEEE P2030.5)” Table D.6 \u2013 “SEP 2.0 (IEEE P2030.5)” Applicability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 64<\/td>\n | Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Industrial-process measurement, control and automation system interface between industrial facilities and the smart grid<\/b><\/p>\n |