{"id":380759,"date":"2024-10-20T03:08:20","date_gmt":"2024-10-20T03:08:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/bs-iso-iec-21838-12021\/"},"modified":"2024-10-26T05:40:56","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T05:40:56","slug":"bs-iso-iec-21838-12021","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/bsi\/bs-iso-iec-21838-12021\/","title":{"rendered":"BS ISO\/IEC 21838-1:2021"},"content":{"rendered":"
This document specifies required characteristics of a domain-neutral top-level ontology (TLO) that can be used in tandem with domain ontologies at lower levels to support data exchange, retrieval, discovery, integration and analysis.<\/p>\n
If an ontology is to provide the overarching ontology content that will promote interoperability of domain ontologies and thereby support the design and use of purpose-built ontology suites, then it needs to satisfy certain requirements. This document specifies these requirements. It also supports a variety of other goals related to the achievement of semantic interoperability, for example, as concerns legacy ontologies developed using heterogeneous upper-level categories, where a coherently designed TLO can provide a target for coordinated re-engineering.<\/p>\n
This document specifies the characteristics an ontology needs to possess to support the goals of exchange, retrieval, discovery, integration and analysis of data by computer systems.<\/p>\n
The following are within the scope of this document<\/p>\n
Specification of the requirements an ontology needs to satisfy if it is to serve as a top-level hub ontology.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Specification of the relations between a top-level ontology and domain ontologies.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Specification of the role played by the terms in a top-level ontology in the formulation of definitions and axioms in ontologies at lower levels.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The following are outside the scope of this document:<\/p>\n
Specification of ontology languages, including the languages OWL 2 and CL, used in ontology development with standard model-theoretic semantics.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Specification of methods for reasoning with ontologies.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Specification of translators between notations of ontologies developed in different ontology languages.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Specification of rules governing the use of IRIs as permanent identifiers for ontology terms.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Specification of the principles of ontology maintenance and versioning.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Specification of how ontologies can be used in the tagging or annotation of data.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2<\/td>\n | undefined <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
6<\/td>\n | Foreword <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
7<\/td>\n | Introduction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
9<\/td>\n | 1 Scope 2 Normative references <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
10<\/td>\n | 3 Terms and definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
13<\/td>\n | 4 Requirements for a top-level ontology 4.1 TLO as textual artefact 4.1.1 Overview <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
14<\/td>\n | 4.1.2 Relations between textual artefact and axiomatizations of the TLO 4.2 Axiomatization in the Web Ontology Language (OWL 2 with direct semantics) 4.2.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | 4.2.2 Alternative OWL 2 Axiomatization 4.3 Axiomatization in a CL-conforming language 4.4 Supplementary documentation 4.4.1 Overview <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
16<\/td>\n | 4.4.2 Documentation of the purpose of the TLO 4.4.3 Documentation concerning demonstration of conformance of a domain ontology to the TLO 4.4.4 Documentation concerning consistency of the CL axiomatization 4.4.5 Documentation concerning the relation between OWL and CL axiomatizations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
17<\/td>\n | 4.4.6 Documentation demonstrating breadth of coverage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
21<\/td>\n | 4.4.7 Domain neutrality 4.4.8 Ontology management 5 Conformity 5.1 Overview <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
22<\/td>\n | 5.2 Ontology documentation 5.3 Supplementary documentation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
23<\/td>\n | Annex A (informative) Examples of ontology suites <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
24<\/td>\n | Annex B (informative) The definition of \u2018ontology\u2019 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
27<\/td>\n | Annex C (informative) Examples of documentation demonstrating breadth of coverage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | Annex D (informative) Conformance of a domain ontology to a TLO <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
31<\/td>\n | Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Information technology. Top-level ontologies (TLO) – Requirements<\/b><\/p>\n |