{"id":41702,"date":"2024-10-17T06:14:08","date_gmt":"2024-10-17T06:14:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/astm-e691-4\/"},"modified":"2024-10-24T15:35:28","modified_gmt":"2024-10-24T15:35:28","slug":"astm-e691-4","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/astm\/astm-e691-4\/","title":{"rendered":"ASTM-E691"},"content":{"rendered":"

ASTM E691-09e1<\/h3>\n

Historical Standard: Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method<\/h4>\n
\n

ASTM E691<\/h4>\n

Scope<\/strong><\/p>\n

1.1 This practice describes the techniques for planning, conducting, analyzing, and treating the results of an interlaboratory study (ILS) of a test method. The statistical techniques described in this practice provide adequate information for formulating the precision statement of a test method.<\/p>\n

1.2 This practice does not concern itself with the development of test methods but rather with gathering the information needed for a test method precision statement after the development stage has been successfully completed. The data obtained in the interlaboratory study may indicate, however, that further effort is needed to improve the test method.<\/p>\n

1.3 Since the primary purpose of this practice is the development of the information needed for a precision statement, the experimental design in this practice may not be optimum for evaluating materials, apparatus, or individual laboratories.<\/p>\n

1.4 Field of Application<\/span>\u2014<\/span>This practice is concerned exclusively with test methods which yield a single numerical figure as the test result, although the single figure may be the outcome of a calculation from a set of measurements.<\/p>\n

1.4.1 This practice does not cover methods in which the measurement is a categorization, such as a go-no-go allocation (two categories) or a sorting scheme into two or more categories. For practical purposes, the discontinuous nature of measurements of these types may be ignored when a test result is defined as an average of several individual measurements. Then, this practice may be applicable, but caution is required and a statistician should be consulted.<\/p>\n

1.5 The information in this practice is arranged as follows:<\/p>\n

1.6 This standard may involve hazardous materials, operations, and equipment. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety problems associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.<\/span><\/p>\n

Keywords<\/strong><\/p>\n

precision; repeatability; reproducibility; repeatability limit; reproducibility limit; Interlaboratory testing; Precision; Repeatability\/reproducibility (RR); Reproducibility; Statistical methods<\/p>\n

ICS Code<\/strong><\/p>\n

ICS Number Code<\/p>\n

DOI:<\/strong> 10.1520\/E0691-09E01<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

PDF Catalog<\/h4>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\nPDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nScope
Referenced Documents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nTerminology
Summary of Practice
Significance and Use <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nILS Membership
Basic Design
Test Method <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nLaboratories
Materials
TABLE 1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nNumber of Test Results per Material
Protocol <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nPilot Run
Full Scale Run
Calculation of the Statistics <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nTABLE 2 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\nTabular and Graphical Display of Statistics
Flagging Inconsistent Results
TABLE 3 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nInvestigation
Task Group Actions
Examples of Interlaboratory Studies
TABLE 4 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\nFIG. 1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\nRepeatability and Reproducibility
FIG. 2 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\nKeywords
FIG. 3 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\nFIG. 4 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\nTABLE 5
TABLE 6
TABLE 7 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\nFIG. 5 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\nFIG. 6 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\nFIG. 7
TABLE 9
TABLE 10 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19<\/td>\nFIG. 8
FIG. 9 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20<\/td>\nTABLE 8
TABLE 12
TABLE 11 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21<\/td>\nX1. THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS
X1.1 Underlying Assumptions of ILS
X1.2 Consistency Statistics <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22<\/td>\nX2. INDEX TO SELECTED TERMS
REFERENCES <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

E691-09e1 Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Published By<\/td>\nPublication Date<\/td>\nNumber of Pages<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ASTM<\/b><\/a><\/td>\n2009<\/td>\n23<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":41703,"template":"","meta":{"rank_math_lock_modified_date":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false},"product_cat":[2637],"product_tag":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-41702","1":"product","2":"type-product","3":"status-publish","4":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"product_cat-astm","8":"first","9":"instock","10":"sold-individually","11":"shipping-taxable","12":"purchasable","13":"product-type-simple"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product\/41702","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/product"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/41703"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41702"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"product_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product_cat?post=41702"},{"taxonomy":"product_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product_tag?post=41702"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}